Assessment
49. Assessment takes a variety of forms. There is the day-today evaluation of pupils' work which gives information about progress and what is needed to make learning more effective. There is also the formal assessment of pupil performance through
[page 19]
public examinations such as the General Certificate of Secondary Education.
50. One of the distinguishing features of CDT is its emphasis on the application of knowledge, skills and understanding to the solution of practical problems, so that pupils will need to use not only what they have learnt in CDT, but also what they have learnt or developed in other aspects of their school work and in other aspects of their experience. Their understanding of mathematics and science and their physical co-ordination are two obvious examples. Teachers of CDT, therefore, need to assess pupils in the light of what they bring to the activity and how well they apply it. At the same time, the degree to which they develop knowledge, skills and understanding as the result of their engagement in CDT itself needs to be appraised. To judge pupils solely by some form of absolute standard of attainment will not do them justice.
51. In addition, although much of the work is directed towards a finished product, the quality of the processes leading to that end is also of major importance. One reason is that the quality of each stage determines to a large extent the quality of the whole. Another is that deciding the approach to a problem or the sequence in which work should be carried out is often a much harder task than producing the finished article or system, and calls for different kinds of capability. Furthermore, different pupils work in different ways and exhibit different abilities and qualities. It is always important that the criteria for assessment should be made plain; for example, that finishing the task will outweigh any other consideration or that unfinished work will be judged on its potential, or that a clearly set out and viable design will be the most important requirement.
52. The nature of the tasks set and the ways in which teaching and learning are conducted affect the range of assessments which it is possible to make. There would be no point, for example, in trying to assess creativity in a task which was limited to following strict, step-by-step instructions, or in looking for skills in oral communication in a classroom or workshop in which talking was effectively discouraged. Equally, it would need to be decided how creativity could usefully be assessed and what kinds of oral communication might be looked for. It is therefore important that the setting of objectives, the teaching approaches used and the means of assessment should be considered together: assessment must be related to the task.
[page 20]
53. Clear descriptions of, and agreement about, the tasks to be performed, clear understanding of what is to be assessed and clearly defined criteria for assessment all increase the objectivity of assessment. Yet objectivity is much easier to achieve in some areas than in others. It is easy to be objective, for example, when the simple recall of information or the performance of a simple skill is required. If that information needs to be interpreted or the skill needs to be carried out with attention to aesthetic or social considerations, the judgement may become more subjective because personal opinions and values become involved. For example, a pupil may produce an artefact which works as intended but its quality may also have to be judged in the context in which it is used. Its use in a family living room may require that it should be small and inconspicuous; in a workshop that it should be very conspicuous so as not to constitute a safety hazard; as a commodity for sale that it should have some aesthetic or psychological appeal to a customer and be within a particular price range; by infirm people that it should be easy to operate. It is immediately apparent that some of these requirements cannot be judged objectively without further refinement because there is room for individual interpretation of words such as 'small' or 'conspicuous' and for a wide variety of opinion as to what will appeal to a customer. In such cases it is necessary that opinions and values are openly considered by pupils, who should be given opportunities to develop their point of view so that a more general agreement about the criteria to be applied in assessing the work may be reached.
54. The need for assessment applies to all ages and is not necessarily a sophisticated process suitable only for older pupils. For example, infants can have their work assessed by adults who can appreciate their particular views of, for example, colour and form, and who can allow that these young children may have entirely legitimate preferences.
55. The assessment of personal attributes and qualities is more difficult and controversial. Yet it is undeniable that pupils demonstrate a range of personal attributes which affect the way they work and results they achieve. Teachers need to take note of these if only for the important reason that work can be planned which exploits those individual capacities beneficially. In reaching an assessment teachers need to take into account pupils' views both of what they are being asked to do and of their own performance as individuals and members of a team.
[page 21]
56. CDT offers many opportunities for pupils to work in groups. It allows an individual to work at some special aspect of the task, as well as individuals to come together at times to perform a task (which could be as simple as moving a heavy object or as complicated as revising the whole plan of work), and the group as a whole to produce an end result. In reaching an assessment teachers should take into account pupils' performance as individuals and as members of a team.
57. Assessments need to be recorded in ways which produce actual benefits. First, they should include clear statements about what a pupil can do and to what degree. Second, they should not go into the kind of excessive detail which makes their maintenance more important than teaching. Third, they must be useful in helping teachers to plan work for individuals; for example a percentage mark representing overall achievement in CDT is of no practical significance; however, a statement that a pupil needs special help to develop further his ability to handle particular tools or has a flair for a specific aspect of design can be used as part of the teacher's planning.