[page 33]
CHAPTER 5: CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF THE YOUTH SERVICE
The Group's views on current Youth Service theory and practice; its potential and actual performance; centre-based and project-based work. Some important modes of operation-participation in decision-making, counselling, community involvement, political education, international aspects.
5.1 In this chapter we shall be developing and explaining our own views on what the Youth Service is doing and should be doing to carry out its primary function of meeting, along with other agencies. the developmental needs of young people. We must make clear at the outset our acceptance and endorsement of the view, cogently argued by many organisations with long and wide experience in the youth field, such as the National Association of Youth Clubs, and backed by much research, that youth is not a time of continuous crisis-a sort of developmental disaster area. Of course all young people have problems as they grow up, but large numbers of young people cope with them successfully, with the help of parents, relatives, friends and their own peer group which has customarily been available in all kinds of society. Although there are forces at work in our society which tend to make these problems very difficult for some, it remains true - and our opinion survey confirms this - that the majority of young people are not in a state of crisis. Nevertheless, the message conveyed by the history of the youth movement to date is that the process of personal development is never easy, and that for a significant and probably increasing minority the process is, through no fault of the young people concerned, desperately difficult.
5.2 Faced with the wide spectrum of needs, we must state as a first principle that the Youth Service has the opportunity and the duty to help all young people who have need of it. While to some young people the Service may appear simply as a means of pleasurably extending their experience, to others it may be a real rescue service. It is important, in our view, that it continue to fulfil both these purposes, and not to concentrate on one to the exclusion of the other. It can sustain both roles, because the methods, context and person-to-person relationships on which the Service is based are flexible enough to fit it for both normal and crisis situations.
The Potential Role
5.3 It is precisely this feature which makes the Service potentially one of the most significant vehicles of social education. In chapter 3 we identified experience as the most meaningful factor in the process of social education. The right "mix" of experience for any particular individual cannot be prescribed. Opportunities can be provided, but the very act of choosing amongst them argues a certain degree of maturity: some young people need help merely to reach this point.
5.4 One can discern here the beginnings of both a beneficent and a vicious spiral. Where opportunities for experience of the right sort are available, and the young have the confidence or the encouragement to grasp them and to know what they are grasping, personal development follows. Where these
[page 34]
opportunities are denied, the very confidence to exercise choice may wither, and alienation may result, brought about by extremes of frustration and despair.
5.5 The Youth Service is not of course the only agency seeking to reinforce the upward spiral and to arrest or reverse the downward one, but it has developed methods and resources specifically adapted to these needs. Foremost amongst these are:
(1) The experiential curriculum: The Youth Service, as we have found, believes strongly in its educational role, with emphasis on the principle of "learning by doing". The process is one which starts with experience and leads through reflection to further experience, such experience being as we have said of the widest kind and essentially self-programmed.
(2) Participation in decision-making: Through the Youth Service young people may for the first time gain experience of what it means to take and follow through collective decisions, and to direct their own activity along with others in an effective and responsible way.
(3) Voluntaryism both in membership and to a large extent in the adult worker role: It is of the essence of the Youth Service that young people remain free to participate or not as they choose. Any form of compulsion destroys this essence. It is also a significant feature of the Service that a large part of its workforce are part-timers or volunteers. We shall have more to say about this in chapter 9. Here we simply note that this involvement of people from all walks of life strongly reinforces the experiential nature of the social education process which the Youth Service can offer.
(4) A non-directive relationship between workers and young people: This follows from the other features. Youth workers have of course a certain authority, but their authority has to be of a different kind from that which young people are likely to have experienced from their teachers, parents and other caring (and non-caring) adults. In brief, young people find with the right sort of youth worker that their views and attitudes are treated with respect.
5.6 All these features can be, often have been, and certainly should be brought into full play in those modes of operation which the public are most apt to see as typical of the Youth Service, namely the youth club or youth organisation with its emphasis on corporate identity and a programme of activities. As we have seen, these modes have in the past constituted the core of Youth Service provision, and they will surely continue to be a prominent part of it. Even within these modes, however, few organisers would argue that mere association or mere activity was all that was being offered. Other ingredients must be present, and these can be offered outside the club setting, in a more specialised form. It is this very variety of form which makes the Youth Service such a potentially powerful force in responding to various categories of need.
Actual Performance
5.7 It has to he said that at the present time this potential is only partly being realised and that as a result the Youth Service is not meeting the social education
[page 35]
needs of young people as fully as it could. We must consider the reasons for this, but it is important to recognise that any criticism along these lines is in point only because the Youth Service has shown by its very success over the years that it is capable of much more. All parties have contributed to this success. Voluntary bodies have shown great flexibility while remaining true to the spirit of their founders. Local education authorities have shown remarkable staying power, often in the face of severe financial difficulties. in continuing to follow up in spirit and in resource terms the lead given long ago in Circular 1486; and have often rivalled the voluntary bodies in inventiveness. By the same token we think all share in the root causes of the failure to obtain the full promise of the Service.
5.8 There are no doubt many who would argue that this failure is basically attributable to a lack of resources. This may be a contributory factor, since nobody can truthfully say that money has been thrown at the Youth Service. We shall be considering the record in chapter 10. Here we would simply observe that in our view the causes of the failure to achieve full promise go deeper than just the resourcing of the Youth Service. As nearly as we can make out, the basic factors are the following:
(1) A failure to work out a coherent and generally accepted theory of social education. Responsibility for this lies at the national level as much as or more than at the local level: there are no instruments for the formulation of accepted objectives.
(2) A failure to put across the meaning and importance of social education. This may sound surprising when the literature of the youth movement is full of argument about the term. But there is a lack of consensus which would register with local councillors, Members of Parliament and the public. Generally speaking the public just does not know what the Youth Service is about.
(3) A patchy and incomplete response to newly emerging social needs. Some parts of the Youth Service are quick to perceive and react to new situations, but in others the responses are very slow and arbitrary, or alternatively take place to the detriment of existing provision.
(4) A failure to appreciate the value and purpose of all the tools which lie ready to hand, to keep proper balance between them and to proportion them to the tasks in hand, which vary from area to area and from time to time. There are many fads and fancies in the youth movement, rarely a balanced strategy.
(5) A failure to exploit all the methods fully. Resources do play a big part here. Initiatives are started without proper evaluation and then not adequately monitored. They may then wane for lack of support even if successful. The strategy and funding should be consistent and long-term, and subject to evaluation.
(6) A failure to take relations with the local community seriously. This again may seem surprising in view of the professed purposes of many youth and community departments. But we have found that community liaison is often more honoured in the breach than the observance. Sometimes the very impetus towards a comprehensive strategy destroys responsiveness to small but important community groups.
[page 36]
(7) A failure to maintain liaison with other providers of services cognate with the Youth Service.
(8) Insufficient scope for young people to organise or share in the organisation of their own activities, or be fully involved in the running of the Youth Service.
(9) Inadequate provision to meet the needs of the over-16s.
5.9 Nearly all these factors are aspects of management or training. They are not of course uniform and universal. Some LEAs and voluntary bodies have shown what can be done, but there is a big gap between these and the generality. We shall have more to say about management in chapter 8. We now propose to illustrate what we say by referring to certain key types of provision.
Centre-based and Project-Based Work
Clubs
5.10 We have seen some excellent clubs and some bad ones. Where they are good, it seems most often to be the case that the organisers, whether statutory or voluntary, have succeeded, first, in maintaining links with the local community and, secondly, in encouraging in various ways the full participation of the members. Success is to be measured not in the sheer number of people participating - though it will usually be found that a club which is successful in other ways does tend to attract large numbers - but in the satisfaction that they get out of it, in the scope that they have for taking decisions of their own about it, in the range, variety and freshness of the activities undertaken, in the numbers of part-time staff and volunteers who take part, and, less tangibly perhaps, in the extent to which members are helped and help each other with counsel and support. Lack of success means the opposite of these things: stereotyped activities, bored and haphazard membership, poor adult support, no real link with the locality.
5.11 Paradoxically club provision, often regarded as the mainstream of youth provision, is in some ways rather a neglected area. Development grants have often tended to be directed to experimental work and not to investigation of the factors making for success in clubs. It is clear that leadership plays a large part in this situation. For example, participation - a feature to which we shall devote a later section of this chapter (5.17-5.22) - is very much dependent on a worker's personal style, skill and commitment. But a worker needs good support, in the shape of premises, equipment, a reasonable allotment of part-time hours, and also a management committee composed of committed people from the neighbourhood. These are matters for the providing body to attend to, and not all do this. Quite often, for example, premises are quite disgracefully tatty, as though anything would do for a youth club.
5.12 One matter which clearly does lie within the competence of providing authorities, whether statutory or voluntary, is the geographical distribution of clubs and centres. Time and again in the course of our visits we have found gross inequalities in the incidence of provision. Areas of a city which are by no means the worst off in terms of facilities will be found to be relatively well endowed with
[page 37]
youth provision by comparison with, say, outlying housing estates which have little or none. There could be an opportunity nowadays, when educational premises are becoming vacant, to alter this situation. We are conscious of the constraints but we still think that something could be done to make sure that the new youth provision is where it is needed, either by the local authorities themselves or by arrangement with a voluntary body. Some of this is going on, but not enough. It is clear that in some cases, whatever arrangements exist, partnership is not working and the overall distribution of resources is not thought out.
5.13 We are aware that in some youth clubs and centres there can be a conflict between providing a wide range of activities and achieving personal development. It is a priority that the staffing of any particular centre should be adequate to meet the individual needs of the participants. Whilst the use of specialists may mean that a wide choice of programme is available, and some specialists become involved in far more of the life of the club than just their own activity, a concentration on specialist staff may prevent the club from meeting the developmental needs of its members. Another dilemma lies in finding the best programme and style for members after the age of 16; they may sometimes feel at this age that the range of activities provided by the club is no longer for them. Our survey indicated boredom at this stage. Self-programming provision is particularly successful here and more attention to the particular needs of the age-group is an urgent requirement.
Uniformed Organisations
5.14 We have referred above (in 3.25-3.26) to the particular contribution of the uniformed organisations. Between them the Girl Guides and Scouts, Girls' and Boys' Brigades and other such groups are the choice of a large number of young people, especially in the younger age-groups. We are impressed by the way in which they have endeavoured to revise their programmes and structures to meet the current needs of their members and yet remain true to their original aims. There are, however, two concerns. A long history of identification with an organisation by some adults is a real source of strength but can also inhibit openness to new ideas. Secondly, the size and history of the uniformed groups can separate them from the rest of the Youth Service. We would encourage them to develop closer links with other providers from whom they can learn and whose work they can enrich.
Project Work
5.15 Albemarle gave some encouragement to complementary work with the "unattached", and in both the LEA and voluntary sectors a number of initiatives have developed in so-called detached or project work. Neither term is particularly apt. The former, which usually connotes work with young people undertaken by full-time and part-time staff on the streets, in coffee bars and other places where the young people might gather, is negative (implying that the young people "ought" to be in a club) and seems to carry overtones of lack of accountability and weak or non-existent management controls. The latter term "project" is usually associated with experimental but nonetheless planned ventures such as advice centres, drop-in centres, employment schemes and the
[page 38]
like, which are not associated with a corporate organisation such as a club. We prefer to use the term project-based in an extended sense to mean all work which is not based on a club or centre with a definite membership. It does not mean an absence of buildings, since most project work requires some kind of base, if only an office; and it most definitely does not imply an absence of appropriate structures for management and supervision.
5.16 In fact, project-based work often does suffer from an absence of management control. The objectives are not clearly enough thought out, the target group is not clearly enough defined, the workers lack support and supervision. This is not as it should be, and it seems to have led to a surprising degree of antipathy to project-based work-a feeling in certain quarters that it is not what the Youth Service is for, that it is untried and that its apparently free and easy style is far too unaccountable. This seems most unfortunate, since the two modes of working-centre-based and project-based-seem to us complementary: a well-founded local strategy should include both, and not only in urban areas. As with other fields of Youth Service work, full-time and part-time workers, including volunteers, can appropriately be used. Obviously both centre-based and project-based modes need their own appropriate arrangements for management control and supervision, and links with other services such as Intermediate Treatment and social service provision; but these are perhaps especially important in the case of project-based work. It is sometimes said that it is difficult or even impossible to evaluate 'detached' work. It is of course difficult to evaluate youth work of any kind: the mere presence of young people in a club is no indication that anything purposeful is happening there. If problems have arisen in the management of project-based work, we think it is because inadequate thought has been given to proper planning and proper reporting and supervision procedures. It is in the nature of this work that the worker is in an isolated position, and it is essential that the management structure should take account of this. There has been no lack of reports and studies on the planning and management of detached work, and we hope that these will be more widely studied and acted upon.
Some Essential Aspects of Provision
Participation
5.17 As we noted in chapter 1, the participative style was recognised quite early to be necessary to meet young people's developmental needs. It is a simple fact of management that a service is apt to be more effective and efficient if there is satisfactory machinery for consulting and involving the beneficiaries, but the primary purpose of participation in the Youth Service is to give the young individual a sense of belonging, a sense of identity, and the skills, confidence and assurance needed to participate not only in his club or organisation but also in society at large. This is a large and important claim. What is the Youth Service doing about it in practice? This was one of the questions we invariably asked on our visits to different localities, and it is an area frequently mentioned in evidence we have received. The only answer seems to be that some success has been achieved, but it is patchy and uncertain. There are encouraging signs, but much more effort needs to be put in.
[page 39]
5.18 The meaning of the term varies according to the degree to which participation takes place within the organisation concerned. The four styles of running an organisation distinguished in an earlier chapter (3.28) define the broad range. The authoritarian style allows for no participation; the paternalistic style for some, but on an informal basis; limited participation may apply to certain defined contexts and activities; full participation takes place where young people are responsible for organising and running the unit or activity concerned. Modalities also differ: many formal models have been evolved and can be seen in operation in different organisations, ranging from token representation, through various forms of shared or parallel management, to a fully democratic structure.
5.19 Any assessment of the current situation must start with the particular context or setting for which provision is being made. There is, first, the level of the activity group - football team, disco, or some other activity to which some members are committed. Secondly, there is the level of the club or organisation itself - its policy, management and finances. Thirdly, there is the level of local affairs, including not only the local Youth Service, but also other matters of local interest such as education, care of the aged and the disabled, library service, extending to issues such as housing and racial discrimination. Fourthly, there is the level of the national youth organisations and the extent to which young people are involved in the overall direction of their policy. Fifthly, there is a whole range of national and international issues in which young people may be involved.
5.20 Broadly we have found that at the first of these levels (the activity group) there is a considerable measure of membership involvement. In some organisations activity groups are more or less self-programming. At the second level (the club or organisation) there is much less evidence of this. Some youth workers told us that there were real difficulties involved when it came to entrusting matters of management and finance to the decision of young people. We appreciate that there are problems in this area. We did, however, see other clubs where these difficulties had been overcome and the young people had a large measure of control in these matters. Some leaders said that they had tried giving young people power to take decisions and had discovered after a time that they were not interested, were involved for a time but lost interest, or did nothing but talk without producing anything constructive. Others said that, once a satisfactory structure had been set up, the young people participated actively. It seems clear that the style, skill and commitment of the individual worker are crucial factors.
5.21 The third level (local affairs) is largely represented by the local youth councils which have come into being in a number of areas. Where they exist they seem to be liked and respected, and the level of participation is generally high; but there are not many of them, and the quality is variable. Sometimes they present the appearance of a debating society, much enjoyed by those young people who are given to that sort of thing, and encouraged by local authorities (through the use of their council chambers and so on) who see their youth councils as 'safe' forms of political education. Elsewhere more serious, informed and thoroughgoing involvement in local affairs is in evidence. At the
[page 40]
fourth level (national youth organisations) the extent of participation varies greatly from one national voluntary organisation to another. Some organisations, such as the National Federation of Young Farmers' Clubs, provide a model of genuine member participation at national level: others still have a long way to go. At the fifth level (national and international affairs) there is a great range of pressure groups which many young people are involved with, and there have been several campaigns launched by young people or youth organisations. There is also a representative youth forum, the British Youth Council, which lobbies the Government on issues of importance to young people. Its view is sometimes sought by different government departments and other agencies.
5.22 Our view on all this, in brief, is that participation should be strengthened at all levels but not through imposition of any standard pattern. By this we mean:
(1) Participation at one level should not necessitate participation at another. There is no need to engineer a progression from one level of responsibility to another, but rather to provide a wide range of participative opportunities. A significant number of young people who have no interest in running their own clubs may well be interested in local community interests and vice versa. There should be opportunities in a variety of contexts.
(2) At club or unit level, members should have a high degree of control over the programme and facilities. This does not necessarily mean the adoption of set forms of organisation which typify adult arrangements. though one reason for the importance of participation at this level is preparation for adult roles. A wide range of structures work in different circumstances. The approach which is indefensible is accepting apathy as a reason for doing nothing. Apathy is an understandable reaction by young people to the situation of being without power and influence. It is the duty of the Youth Service to offer a positive challenge to their view of themselves and their abilities and to explore many different ways of doing this.
(3) At the level of the local youth council, efficient structures are necessary to ensure wide representation and to enable a fairly large assembly to function at all. But some of the ceremonial trappings and the formal machinery of holding committee meetings could well be dispensed with. to make way for real and serious debate about things that matter. Youth councils should be involved in action as well as discussion, and need to be built into the local policy-making machinery. A useful report from the British Youth Council*, funded by a DES grant, has signposted a way for future development.
(4) At both club and youth council level it is essential that the decisions and proposals of young people should be followed up. If there are delays and difficulties, reasons should be given and information fed back. Likewise, before and later, full and accurate information should be supplied to the young people concerned.
*'A Democratic Voice? The Changing Role of Youth Councils' by John Denham and Martin Notley (BYC, 1982).
[page 41]
(5) A strong stimulus to local youth groups is provided by meetings with other similar groups from different parts of the country or region. Too often, groups attempt to develop participation in complete isolation from each other. In this situation a group can become too reliant on a particular worker, and if he or she should go performance is apt to tail off. National organisations can play a useful role in helping bring different groups together.
(6) All the above depend on youth workers having the appropriate commitment, style and skills to encourage participation. Training materials such as those produced by a DES-funded project at the National Council for Voluntary Youth Services* are helpful in developing appropriate attitudes. Youth workers must be careful not to allow their own interests and expectations to colour the young people's range of interests, and must expect that on occasions their own position will be vulnerable.
(7) To equip workers for this role, initial and in-service training programmes should place more emphasis on the whole subject of participation.
Information, Advice and Counselling
5.23 Many young people have difficulty in gaining information about what is expected of them in given situations, about what they should expect from others and about opportunities which are available. They have a strong desire to discuss, both with their peers and adults, a whole range of matters which may have associated problems. It is important that young people have access to someone they can easily approach, someone they feel they can trust to understand their point of view and who is also well informed. Young people also need to have access to people trained in counselling skills to offer personal support on those occasions when information and advice are not of themselves adequate.
5.24 It is clear from our survey that by far the greatest amount of advice and information is obtained by young people from their families or friends, including friends of their own age; but they need facilities for approaching others on occasions when they cannot or do not wish to use their normal sources. Usually these occasions will be critical ones, and there is the more reason that the extra facilities should be sound, trustworthy, personal and confidential.
5.25 A number of agencies exist to provide such information, advice and counselling - some connected with the Youth Service, some not. Television and radio programmes may provide a service by phone-in or response to letters, and magazines may give advice by letter. Various services offer advice by telephone. Specialist advice is available on particular problems or subjects from national organisations outside the Youth Service, but the significance of the type of provision associated with the Youth Service is that it addresses the more personal problems of young people, and may come into play at an earlier stage in the
*'Young People and Decisions: A Resource Pack on Participation' by Martin Shaw and Alison Foster (NCVYS, 1981).
[page 42]
development of those problems, before perhaps they have been specially identified, By the same token, youth workers must be ready to refer young people to more specialised agencies if a particular problem is identified.
5.26 There are broadly three ways in which the Youth Service strives to meet this need:
(1) In most clubs and centre-based organisations adult workers, whether full-time, part-time or voluntary, normally find themselves in information. advice and counselling work. It is obviously impossible to quantify how much goes on. The familiarity and ease of the surroundings which favour this method also make it impossible to measure. In such surroundings also young people may do much to help one another. This is clearly an important strand in clubs and centres, and it would be a strange job specification for a youth worker which did not take account of it.
(2) There is a heavy emphasis on information, advice and counselling in what we have above called project-based work. While detached workers may aim to encourage activities of many different kinds, a basic factor is nearly always the provision of information, advice and help with personal difficulties.
(3) Over the past 10-15 years especially, a number of centres have come into existence specialising in youth counselling on a drop-in basis, or by phone or letter. These may be funded by LEAs. by large voluntary organisations or by small local bodies, and may use full-time, part-time and voluntary workers. As we might expect, many of these centres report great difficulty in funding, owing to the withdrawal or uncertainty of financial support. At the same time most agencies report steadily increasing usage.
5.27 It would be unfortunate in our view if any of these facilities were to be taken as excluding the others. The balance between them may vary from area to area, but each one has virtues which the other two do not possess, and the provision of suitable information, advice and counselling seems to us so important that the three methods may be taken as complementary, and all part of the mainstream of youth provision.
5.28 The implications of this are, first, that an assured place should be given to information, advice and counselling within the local planning of youth provision. Too often we have found that haphazard initiatives, often very good in themselves, are thought to be sufficient to meet the need, and there is no attempt to work them into a comprehensive policy. Account should be taken of which age-group the provision is for, the type of provision envisaged, the numbers and kinds of staff required and the location where the service is to be given. It should be the aim of local and national management to ensure that the various organisations involved can work together in a co-ordinated and cooperative way. It should not be left to the young people to find their way amidst a plethora of different channels of advice and help. It will normally be necessary that the planning, policy-making and management framework should be interdisciplinary, in the sense that the Youth Service will need to collaborate with
[page 43]
schools, colleges of further education, the careers service, DHSS and social service departments, probation service, family planning agencies and many more besides.
5.29 Above all it seems essential that the funding of these operations should be put on a more regular and systematic basis. It is often the case that different sections of the official counselling facilities in an area are financed by different services in almost total isolation from one another, while the independent information, advice and counselling agencies struggle on from year to year with uncertain and tenuous funds. Multiple funding is probably inevitable in the circumstances, but this is no reason why an adequate and comprehensive budget plan should not be drawn up by all the services acting together, and appropriate assistance given to the voluntary agencies.
Community Involvement
5.30 Though various forms of service to the community are long established in the Youth Service, renewed emphasis was given to it from the early 1960s, springing from a conscious need to broaden the area of contact between education and society. The demand for more opportunities for young people, combined with a growing appreciation of the educational implications of such experience, led to the growth of a number of both local and national organisations. such as the Community Service Volunteers (CSV). The Youth Service Development Council commissioned in 1965 a report on the need for 'Facilities for the Co-ordination of Community Services by Young People', and a national independent organisation, the Young Volunteer Force Foundation (later to become the Community Projects Foundation), was set up in 1967. By this time a pattern of "clearing-house" organisations was established. These seek or accept referrals for service from institutions, social service departments, and others; assess the type of service required and the sort of volunteer best suited for it; allocate the task; and keep a check on performance.
5.31 This type of "community service" developed rapidly in schools and in higher and further education as wen as in the Youth Service and was encouraged by the DES. During the same period the concept of community service gained currency as an alternative to custodial treatment for young offenders. More recently, since the initiative given by the Youth Opportunities Programme, community service schemes for the young unemployed have become a major option within that programme, and seem likely to continue with the new Youth Training Scheme. In this way the idea of community service, used mainly to mean an organised pattern of activity in which young people perform tasks which are of benefit to other members of the community, has become very widespread; and special merits are claimed for it as a form of social education particularly appropriate to the time.
5.32 Before we can state our view on this, it seems necessary to clarify what we mean by community involvement and relate it more clearly to the primary purposes of social education. The basic motive in most young people who are drawn to this sort of activity is in most cases a simple desire to help other individuals whom they see as disadvantaged in some way. Given an understanding of the local community this can lead to an impulse to seek to
[page 44]
understand the causes of disadvantage and if possible remove or lessen them; and for some at least of the young people concerned service to others is a stepping stone to active participation in community affairs, through projects aimed to affect the whole community, or sections of it, rather than individuals. We believe that this is a not only natural but also highly desirable progression in the personal development of the young individual. Whether one calls the whole process "service" or "action" is immaterial: perhaps "community involvement" would be the best term. It is our strong conviction that the process is an essential part of the social and political education curriculum which the Youth Service has to offer, provided that:
(1) it is at all points subject to the free choices and decisions of the participants;
(2) appropriate training is provided;
(3) it is undertaken in a context which encourages reflection on the experience gained;
(4) it embraces the whole spectrum of action from simple benevolence to participatory action in the community;
(5) the fieldworkers involved in organising opportunities are careful not to impose their own viewpoints or objectives on the young people involved, who should play their part in the planning and management; and
(6) the workers themselves are properly trained.
5.33 We make these points with some emphasis because although the widespread promotion of "community service" is welcome in many different ways, some confusion has resulted. We wish to repeat that community involvement in its full form embracing both "service" and "action" seems to us part of the mainstream of youth provision. It seems to have become associated in the minds of many people with young people who are in trouble or at risk, or less capable than the average of finding and keeping a job. Some see it as a way of achieving discipline. It is, however, clear to us that any form of compulsion and coercion would defeat the primary purpose of the activity. There needs to be maximum freedom of choice and opportunity, and there will no doubt continue to be a place both for large-scale national organisations and for locally based agencies. Not all will be connected with the Youth Service, but at least in those which are we would expect to see the features outlined in points (1)-(6) above.
Political Education
5.34 Politics is the term we apply to the forces which give society the shape and direction it has - i.e. which tend to change it or keep it as it is. These forces are based on attitudes - of individuals and of groups - and spring from the activity resulting from those attitudes - i.e. from people acting on their convictions. That activity can take certain institutionalised forms, such as voting in an election, joining a political party, engaging in canvassing etc. This is what most people think political action is. But political action can take place in a number of institutions in the community - for example, in industry or the churches - and can take forms such as making representations, getting up petitions, and in general trying to change the aspect of an institution, community or society which
[page 45]
impinges on the participant in an unacceptable way. Just as there are social skills which enable one to feel at home in society, so there are political skills which enable one to change it or keep it as it is if someone else is trying to change It.
5.35 In a democratic society it is inevitable and desirable that there should be a diversity of ideas and opinions. Our political tradition depends on consensus being reached on various issues. While it is accepted that differences cannot always be resolved, an understanding of and a respect for the views of others lies at the very heart of civilised and organised society. This implies a certain level of political literacy. Yet amongst the adult population there is widespread political illiteracy and indeed a failure to understand what "politics" is. Political education then is necessary. Our opinion survey seems to suggest that most young people see themselves as uninterested in politics but paradoxically hold strong views about a variety of issues which might be called political. We believe that, if they had a better knowledge of the processes by which change can be effected and greater skill and confidence in using them to put their views into effect, they would be less likely to resort to more violent methods of expressing their views about society.
5.36 The amount of political education actually carried on within the Youth Service seems to be relatively small. One national youth organisation estimated that only some 5% of its local units included any element of it in their programmes. The majority of LEA responses painted a similar picture with comments like "we have to be wary of that". We believe that this is dangerous.
5.37 Political education is not the same thing as political studies or civics though it may include some elements of civics. Much of the political education in schools or even within the Youth Service has this passive character. It is not enough. What is required is experience of such a kind that the young people learn to claim their right to influence the society in which they live and to have a say in how it is run. It is active participation in some form of political activity, formal or informal, which really counts. We have not found that such participation is at all widespread, and we shall examine in a moment some reasons for this. We must first, however, deal with two possible objections to the argument we are now putting forward.
5.38 It is sometimes argued that it is sufficient to provide information to young people or to expose them to those who hold conflicting views in some kind of "forum" or discussion evenings. Such methods have their place of course but they belong to the knowledge-imparting kind of political education, which we have argued is not enough. Again it may be argued that if young people want to learn about political activity they can always join one of the youth organisations associated with political parties. It is clearly important for young people to have an awareness of the views of all political persuasions, including extreme groups, and to learn how to evaluate them; but this of itself would provide only an inadequate understanding of the range of political action and knowledge as we have defined it. Such political involvement can result in membership of a wide range of organisations in addition to political parties.
5.39 The Youth Service has the potential to fulfil a much needed and vital role not only as a forum for the theory of political education but also as a scene of
[page 46]
political activity addressed to issues which are of concern to young people. Through the internal machinery of their youth clubs or centres, through the wider scope offered by various forms of youth council in the locality, through participation in local and national issues, the Service can offer young people a real opportunity to express their views in the relatively "safe" context appropriate to the inexperience of those taking part.
5.40 It is at this point that difficulties begin to appear. Within the machinery of the Youth Service itself, as we have noted in 5.17-5.22 above, the fully participative style is not easy to manage. In political terms there is a real conflict between "safety" and "reality". For political education to be effective, risks have to be taken with the decision-making machinery of the youth club or local youth council. But to the extent that it is effective, young people and their leaders will naturally be led to look beyond the confines of the Youth Service itself and take part in wider issues. This inescapably incurs the risk of controversy and conflict. Where there are contending groups in the adult world, involved in economic, environmental or community questions, the dangers for young people are obvious. There is a real problem here which those who advocate political education within the Youth Service must surely face.
5.41 There is obviously no ready-made solution to this dilemma, which has always been a part of the regular experience of people with pastoral responsibility in any walk of life. We can offer some reflections and suggestions which may be helpful to youth workers, their managers and their employers, recognising that if political education is not a "safe" thing, neither is democracy, and one will not flourish without the other.
(1) There should be more national recognition of the essential place of political education and of its implications. As it is, too much lip-service is paid to the virtues of the democratic society, without enough attention being paid to the risks and hard work involved. Later in this report we will be arguing for the establishment of a national body which can grapple with important issues of a practical or management nature. Such a body could help to focus attention on the place of political education within the Youth Service.
(2) There should be more local discussion. With regard to the specific dilemma noted above, some observers have argued that it should be possible for youth workers to negotiate some kind of "contract" with their managing bodies or authorities, which would, so to speak. find the limits of their freedom in involving young people in political activity and so create "space" for legitimate activity. We doubt whether a charter of this kind would in fact stand up to the test in a specific case-partly because it would be impossible to foresee all the relevant circumstances, and partly because pieces of paper are apt to be thrown on one side when it comes to a pinch. Discussion and intercommunication between workers and management - with the full involvement of young people - are essential.
(3) Management committees and other structures devised to help the individual worker should play a more active part and not leave the problem to the conscience of the individual.
[page 47]
(4) More attention should be paid in training courses, both initial and inservice, to the complexities and difficulties of the problem and the responsibilities of all interests concerned.
5.42 The problem is an aspect of the professional responsibility of individual youth workers. The above suggestions if followed may help to ensure that individual workers are not left in an exposed and isolated position, but in the last analysis they themselves have to give a lead. Training, experience and the supporting apparatus of supervision and management can reinforce personal integrity, but not supplant it.
International Aspects
5.43 We have so far considered young people's participation in and interaction with the world purely on a local or national scale. Clearly it is today more difficult than ever to confine considerations in this way. Many more people of all ages have experience of other countries through visits and holidays, and awareness of social, political, cultural and sporting events on the international scale is disseminated through television and other media. We have spoken earlier (in 5.34) of issues of a political kind which create interest and concern among young people. These are often of an international nature. Clearly questions such as the relations between East and West or the First and Third World are of interest to the whole community. More specifically, with its membership of the European Community and the Commonwealth, the United Kingdom has formal political links with some other countries.
5.44 It is possible to identify four broad types of international contact. First, there is a long history of youth exchanges and visits. These have recently increased. Exchanges are arranged, for example, between professional, sporting, cultural, handicapped and religious groups usually with assistance from government funds. Secondly, there are the World or European Federations of the Voluntary Youth Organisations. These provide an opportunity for young people from broadly similar organisations to meet together and gain an understanding of each other's history and culture. Thirdly, there are existing opportunities for young people to spend short or medium-term periods in other countries assisting with community development. This is achieved through exchanges of specialist staff and work camps. Lastly, there are contacts, particularly between national youth councils, throughout Europe and the Commonwealth. These may have a political nature and be concerned to put pressure on organisations like the European Community, the Council of Europe or the United Nations. These contacts provide an opportunity to consider common problems and to attempt to find common solutions. They also allow a greater understanding to be achieved by young people of different countries.
5.45 The opportunities that these international contacts create are often inadequately fulfilled. Young people themselves may be insufficiently involved in the planning; the groups are often small and unrepresentative; when abroad they may fail to have proper contact with the culture or young people in the country visited; and on return there is often too little reflection on the experiences gained or feedback into the general programme of their group.
[page 48]
Another cause for concern is the limited range of countries to which visits are made or from which young people come to this country.
5.46 There are many international projects organised in England which enable young people to share in the experience of international contact and understanding. It is important that youth organisations should be aware of these, as one of the ways of ensuring awareness of the international dimension among youth workers and young people.
5.47 Summary of recommendations
(1) The Youth Service has the duty to help all young people who have need of it. (5.2)
(2) The Youth Service's task is to provide social education. It has developed specific methods of working, including the experiential curriculum, voluntaryism, a non-authoritative relationship between workers and young people, and encouraging young people to participate in decision-making. All these modes of operation should be brought into play. (5.5-5.6)
(3) LEAS and voluntary bodies, in partnership, should ensure a more equitable geographical spread of Youth Service provision. (5.12)
(4) Provision for the over-16s is an urgent requirement. (5.13)
(5) Participation by young people should be strengthened at all levels - in activity groups, clubs, local affairs, national youth organisations and at the national and international levels. It may follow a variety of patterns. (5.19-5.22)
(6) An assured place should be given to provision of information, advice and counselling within planning of local provision. The providing authorities should give thought to this, and ensure that funding is on a regular and systematic basis. (5.28-5.29)
(7) Community involvement should be available for all young people with maximum freedom of choice and opportunity. (5.33)
(8) The provision of political education should be a normal part of the Youth Service curriculum, pursued in such ways as to involve active participation. Ways to bring this about include more attention to political education in training courses and active consideration at a national and local level, especially involving management committees. (5.36-5.41)
(9) Youth workers should build awareness of the international context into their work. (5.46)