[page 30]
ANNEX B
WAYS IN WHICH INITIAL TEACHER TRAINING MIGHT BE IMPROVED
Advice to the Secretaries of State from the Advisory Committee on the Supply and Education of Teachers.
100. The Secretaries of State have asked for advice on ways in which initial teacher training might be improved. We have undertaken this work bearing in mind the DES consultation paper on qualified teacher status (on which we have already offered comments) which envisaged among other things that all initial teacher training courses might be reviewed; the HM Inspectorate paper on the content of initial teacher training courses which has now been revised and published in its own right; HM Inspectorate reports on "The New Teacher in School" and the earlier national primary and secondary surveys; the DES support for school-based initial teacher training and the IT-INSET projects; the recent restructuring of the initial teacher training system; the importance attached by the Government and local education authorities to in-service training as indicated by provision in successive expenditure White Papers and the introduction of the new in-service training grants; and points made in public statements about initial teacher training by the Secretary of State for Education and Science.
The present distribution of responsibilities
101. Statutory responsibility for the granting of professional recognition as a teacher in England and Wales rests with the Secretary of State. Schedule 5 of the Education (Teachers) Regulations 1982 sets out the present arrangements. With certain specified exceptions recognition as a qualified teacher is acquired on successful completion of a teacher training course approved for the purpose by the Secretary of State. This approval is quite distinct from the validation of courses for academic purposes. The Secretary of State's powers of professional approval apply to both university and public sector courses.
102. The Education (Teachers) Regulations 1982 are so framed that candidates who successfully complete an approved initial teacher training course are automatically awarded qualified teacher status. Thus, the assessment of professional suitability, in addition to academic suitability, is an integral part of the training process. It is not now subject to a separate recommendation from the training institution to the Secretary of State.
103. The need for approval by the Secretary of State is of relatively recent origin. Until 1975, when they were rescinded, the Training of Teachers Regulations 1967 specified that it was a responsibility of "relevant organisations", defined as "the Area Training Organisation or other body approved by the Secretary of State", to supervise courses of training and advise on the approval of persons as teachers in schools. With the repeal of the Regulations, ATOs were
[page 31]
disbanded. At the same time Circular 5/75 stated in relation to initial teacher training:
"In approving courses for the purposes of the new Schools Regulation 16(2)(a)(i) [since replaced by the Education (Teachers) Regulations 1982] the Secretary of State will wish to satisfy himself that the body awarding the degree or certificate has established a committee or delegacy on which members of the teaching profession and their employers are suitably represented to advise, inter alia, on the professional aspects of such courses, including their duration, standard and academic supervision and the adequacy of the arrangements of the institutions providing them for recommending suitability for the teaching profession. These committees will therefore have a supervisory function over courses leading to qualified teacher status and over arrangements for recommending suitability for the teaching profession comparable with that exercised by the former Area Training Organisations".
In 1977 the DES said that in approving new courses of initial teacher training the Secretary of State would rest on the recommendation of professional committees or delegacies established in accordance with the terms of Circular 5/75.
104. There is a wide measure of agreement both within and beyond ACSET that the establishment of a General Teaching Council, which among other things might advise on the control of entry and approve courses of training, remains a desirable objective. Proposals for the establishment of such a body were published in the Weaver Report on "A Teaching Council for England and Wales" (HMSO 1970). It has so far proved difficult to achieve agreement about the form and constitution of such a Council and despite independent initiatives such as those of the College of Preceptors, the future existence of a General Teaching Council cannot be relied upon as a basis for immediate policy decisions.
105. Meanwhile we believe that within the existing framework of responsibilities there is scope for securing improvement in the professional approval and monitoring of initial teacher training courses while at the same time preserving and encouraging worthwhile diversity, protecting the autonomy of academic validating bodies, and strengthening processes of individual and institutional evaluation and review.
Criteria for the Approval of Courses
106. We recognise the Secretaries of State's concern that the power to approve initial teacher training courses should be used appropriately and to good effect. To this end, we believe that the Secretary of State should establish. criteria which he will take into account in deciding whether or not to approve, or to continue to approve, individual courses. In so recommending, we distinguish between the function of the Secretary of State's approval and the validation and award of academic qualifications. We believe that the Secretary of State should be concerned with the broad framework and structure of courses leaving detailed content to academic institutions and their validating bodies.
[page 32]
107. In our view the Secretaries of State should seek to use the existing powers to ensure as far as possible that those awarded qualified teacher status (i) possess suitable personal qualities, (ii) have achieved appropriate academic standards, (iii) have acquired sufficient professional and practical knowledge and skills. Criteria for approving initial teacher training courses should therefore relate to the initial selection of student, to the level and amount of subject content of courses (including first degrees in the case of PGCE courses), to professional content and to links between training institutions and schools. We believe that ACSET provides an appropriate forum in which to develop such criteria and to offer advice to the Secretaries of State.
108. We attach great importance to there being a satisfactory match between teachers' qualifications and training, including in-service training, and the teaching programmes they undertake. So far as initial teacher training is concerned we believe that, while recognising the complexities of the school system and the difficulties posed by the 16-19 group, this principle points towards courses which will train teachers to deal with a specific age range such as 3-8, 7-12 or 13, or 11-18. Primary training courses should be designed to equip teachers to cover the primary curriculum appropriate to the age range concerned and also to have additional expertise in one particular area. Secondary teachers have a narrower curriculum focus related in the main to one or more school subjects and secondary courses should be designed to equip students accordingly. These considerations apply to all initial training for school teachers, whether undergraduate or postgraduate. In the latter case the first degree courses must necessarily provide the subject base for training.
109. Initial teacher training cannot equip teachers for their whole careers, nor for every kind of teaching work that they may subsequently undertake; and, however effective their initial training, new teachers will have particular needs in their first year of service. Induction, on which we propose to offer advice, has an essential part to play here. Initial training should not aim to equip teachers as specialists in, for example, careers work or special education. Teachers who wish to specialise in such areas should do so after a period of teaching experience in ordinary schools. It is therefore vital that sufficient in-service training opportunities of the right kind should be available and accessible to meet the needs for such specialist teachers. In-service training is important for all teachers and will be essential for those who wish to extend their teaching into a different subject or age range. We also propose to offer advice on in-service training.
Selection of Students
110. Students entering a course of initial teacher training should be expected to meet general criteria appropriate for entry into the teaching profession as a whole, and particular criteria specific to the courses for which they are candidates. We acknowledge that selection is extremely difficult and we recognise that institutions make efforts to adopt rigorous selection procedures. Nevertheless in the recent past the persistent imbalance between demand for and supply of initial'. teacher training places may have contributed to the admission of some unsuitable candidates. In our view there can be no justification for admitting to initial teacher training individuals who, academic competence apart, lack the qualities likely to enable them to become successful teachers, even if this leads to
[page 33]
shortages in some areas. Entry to a training course should continue to rely, in part, on success at interview and should not depend totally on academic qualifications, letters of application and professional references. Interview may be unreliable as a self-standing instrument of selection, but it provides valuable evidence about important oral skills as well as giving candidates themselves otherwise unavailable information about the requirements of courses. As far as possible, intending teachers should be encouraged to obtain some experience in schools before embarking upon a training course.
Structure of Initial Teacher Training Courses
111. The intention should be that criteria would go some way to defining the structure of initial teacher training courses in terms of their aims and the knowledge, skills and other qualities needed by school teachers. They should reflect the best of current practice and reinforce an approach to initial teacher training which recognises the practical application of academic and pedagogic skills and which is sufficiently flexible to allow new developments to take place. The criteria would also provide employers of teachers and students themselves with a clearer idea of the range of training which new teachers undergo.
Links with LEAs, Schools and the Profession
112. Lack of recruitment and opportunities to posts in teacher training as a consequence of the rundown of the 1970s means that there are now many initial trainers without recent teaching experience in schools, and too few have sufficient regular contact with classroom teaching. Considerable emphasis needs to be placed on the quality of collaboration with schools, to ensure that initial training includes appropriate elements of professional and educational studies closely linked with practical experience, and involving active participation by experienced teachers. It is not only teacher trainers who benefit from close contact with the current work of schools. It is also schools themselves, where the experience and knowledge of colleagues from training institutions represent a valuable source of external support. We commend the principle of joint teacher/lecturer appointments and of teacher/lecturer exchange and believe that training institutions should have close working relationships with local education authorities.
113. We believe that the Secretary of State should take full account of the quality of collaboration between training institutions and schools. Touchstones for the professional recognition of courses should be their ability to provide basic and appropriate curriculum knowledge, professional competence, and classroom skills. This will require redeployment of resources, probably with some increase at the margin. We believe that the Secretary of State should take into account institutions' arrangements for ensuring that staff are able to keep themselves aware of current work in schools. Those staff concerned with pedagogy should themselves be trained teachers and this should be reflected in future appointments.
The Role of Professional Committees
114. As explained above, the Secretary of State's approval of courses presently rests on the advice of professional committees or delegacies. Although no formal survey of their work has so far been undertaken there appears to be con-
[page 34]
siderable variety in the way in which they have interpreted their task. In some areas, the emphasis has been more on monitoring the arrangements whereby institutions made recommendations on qualified teacher status to DES, rather than assessing the professional content and suitability of courses.
115. We affirm that professional committees have an important part to play in the improvement of teacher training. We believe that there is a need for a clearer distinction between professional approval and academic validation than is presently the case. The introduction of criteria and of reviews of existing courses would change the nature of the task that professional committees are asked to undertake. We therefore recommend that they should be re-established with constitutions acceptable to the respective validating bodies and approved by the Secretary of State. Their constitutions should provide for representation of teachers and employers, and their structures and methods of working should encourage effective participation of all these parties. The guidelines in Circular 5/75 should be reviewed. The location and administrative base of the Committees and their relationship with a possible General Teaching Council are matters which require further consideration. ACSET proposes to offer advice on all these issues.
Steps to be Taken
116. Our work so far calls for (i) the reconstitution of the professional committees, and (ii) development of criteria for use by the Secretary of State in approving initial teacher training courses. ACSET could undertake responsibility for such work as needs to be done immediately. The work would include (a) a survey of existing professional committees and delegacies and consideration of the extent to which their present terms of reference, membership and procedures are satisfactory in relation to the tasks assigned to them and (b) the preparation of advice, taking account of relevant views expressed by HM Inspectorate and others, on the criteria that should be applied when approving a course of initial teacher training. If this were acceptable we would aim to submit our recommendations by the end of July 1983 to enable the Secretary of State to use the new criteria from the beginning of the autumn term when approving new courses and subsequently reviewing existing courses, and to enable reestablished professional committees to contribute to the process of course review and reapproval as soon as possible thereafter. The timetable for these reviews of existing courses should be determined in conjunction with the validating bodies,
117. There is presently an automatic link between the award of an approved BEd or PGCE or other approved qualification and qualified teacher status. We believe that satisfactory completion of an approved initial teacher training course must carry with it the clear view of the training institution that the individuals have not only completed the academic part of their course satisfactorily but also have acceptable professional competence including practical teaching skills. We recommend that institutions should explicitly certify, when notifying DES, that the student has satisfactorily completed the professional component of his course. This judgment should be at least partly dependent on the assessment by the school at which final teaching practice takes place.
[page 35]
118. In the absence of an adequate level of professional competence, a PGCE, which is solely concerned with building professional skills upon an existing academic base, should not be awarded. However rigorous the selection for BEd courses, and the extent of pre-course experience, it is inevitable that some students will prove not to be suited to teaching but will, nevertheless, be of sufficient academic ability to complete a course of higher education. Wherever possible it is desirable that institutions should develop arrangements which enable those students who are academically competent but not successful in the classroom to divert to a different course or be awarded at the end of a three or four year course a different academic qualification which does not carry with it qualified teacher status. Institutions should bear in mind restrictions imposed by the Awards Regulations. They should be encouraged to adopt course patterns, including links with schools, which identify as early as possible students who are unlikely to display satisfactorily the professional competence which will be needed.
Summary of Recommendations
119. We recommend that:
(a) ACSET should undertake further work with the aim of submitting recommendations by the end of July 1983 to enable the Secretary of State to establish criteria to be taken into account in deciding whether to approve or re-approve initial training courses (paragraphs 106 and 116).
(b) The criteria should relate to the initial selection of students, the level and amount of subject content of courses, professional content, and links between training institutions and schools and should reflect the complexities of the educational system (paragraphs 107 -113).
(c) ACSET should undertake further work, with the aim of submitting recommendations by the end of July 1983, to enable reconstituted professional committees to be established (paragraphs 115 and 116),
(d) The satisfactory completion of an approved initial teacher training course must include acceptable professional competence including practical teaching skills (paragraph 117).
(e) Wherever possible institutions should be encouraged to adopt course patterns which identify as early as possible students who are academically competent but unlikely to display satisfactory professional competence and which permit them to transfer to a different course leading to an academic qualification without qualified teacher status (paragraph 118).
Advisory Committee on the Supply and Education of Teachers January 1983.