[page 51]
Appendix
Some Individual Accounts
These four accounts are written by the heads of the schools concerned, or by others who know the schools intimately. They are representative of a much larger number which were made available.
1. A village school
This school is nearly a hundred years old. A typical flint building, one large classroom and one extremely small one with the headteacher's house forming one wing. There are 39 children on roll. The headmistress has been at the school for over 25 years and her infant teacher has been with her eight years. They have become quite close friends and work in complete accord. They have the same educational philosophy, the same friendly, though down to earth, attitude to the parents and the village in general.
This is an aided school in more than name; the children are used to going into the very beautiful old parish church nearby, not only for services but to draw it, to study its architecture and to learn history from it. The vicar is an actively interested manager. The headmistress and 15 of the children sing in the church choir and choir practices are held in the schoolroom after school one afternoon each week. The organist is also a manager. There is also a choir of mothers who help the children at their Christmas and Easter carol services. The managers all know the school intimately and are very proud of it.
The headmistress knows every family well and has taught many of the parents of her present pupils. A formal PTA would be out of place here for close links are continually being forged without formality. Parents come in and out of school freely and naturally; it is quite usual to find one or two mothers in the schoolroom at the end of the day discussing problems or a child's progress. They often bring little gifts, mushrooms, or eggs. It is clear that they all regard her affectionately as the leader of the village and one of the leaders of the church. They obviously feel they can talk to her frankly about their personal problems; they trust her discretion and reliability, and they value her kindly yet shrewd and astringent assessments of their children. With her they don't have to "pretend" and it would be impossible here for a child to play off school against home.
[page 52]
There are various activities in which parents are involved:
(i) they always help to organise school expeditions to places of interest in the neighbourhood, e.g. this summer six parents organised transport and drove the whole school over to the Roman villa and took an interest in the follow-up work that was done;
(ii) several fathers helped to coach football and the parents organise a sports afternoon every summer;
(iii) they provided a delightful supply of plants and flowers for the schoolrooms;
(iv) fathers are always ready to make things, e.g. bookcases and sports apparatus. Mothers of course, help the headmistress with clothes and properties for nativity plays and pageants, etc.;
(v) money raising does not obtrude but parents organise and run a social evening and a sale of work every year with excellent results. It is remarkable that such a small village raised £740 towards the school's swimming pool in a year.
This school is scheduled for closure in a few years' time, when the buildings of a school in a near-by larger village are extended. The community will bitterly resist this change and it is significant that ten families in the larger village are at present sending their children to this school, in spite of transport difficulties, because they prefer the more intimate "family" atmosphere. This account might more accurately have been called village and school for the school spreads its influence to the whole community and serves it.
2. A junior school with a mixed catchment area
There is not at the moment, and I am determined never will be, direct parent-teacher relationship at this school. Rather, there must be relationship, by, through and what-you-will of the child, but always because of the child.
Our first contact with parents is made by their children knowing us, as people with whom they have had close contact, long before they enter this school. I make it a regular duty to go to our contributory infant school where the relationship between the two schools allows me freedom to make personal contact with the children. Later, in the last term of the children's infant career, the two teachers in charge of the first year classes for the following year, go across and listen to each child read, look at the children's work generally and while they are acquiring a knowledge of the pupils' attainments and potential are much more aware that they are there to sell themselves, as future friends and teachers, to the children.
[page 53]
Still later, the children are brought across to the "big" school where they are met by the two teachers and myself and are given a conducted tour of the school. This includes every classroom, the toilets, stockroom, staffroom, especially my office, where they are told they will - if they are good boys and girls - be allowed to bring dinner books and biscuit money etc. There must be no unknown corner, we sell the school. Consequently, on the first day when each child comes to school with its parents, there is no nervousness, no venturing into the unknown. The children are not brought on that first day "by" their parents, rather they are bringing "their" parents to be introduced to "their" school and "their" teachers.
Many of the parents have or have had children in school, a number of the parents are ex-pupils themselves, there is a climate of belonging, we now have to bring new parents into our family proper and at the same time reinforce our bonds with old friends.
At this time there is opportunity to make certain points:
(a) There is no time when parents are not welcome in school "While we would appreciate an appointment, we realise this is not always possible, so don't hesitate to come into school at any time. Do not wait for a specific reason. The fact that your children are in this school is reason enough to come in at any time to have a talk about them. The more we know about your children the better we shall be able to teach them."
(b) It is part of the normal school function for parents to join us for morning assembly. "We expect you, so will your child. Don't let your child feel that other parents are more interested in their children than you are in them, because other parents join us regularly for assembly and you do not." Moral blackmail? Of course it is. The parents realise this, it flatters them that they are important enough to be so needed. The school benefits - so do the parents.
Quite often it is important to remind parents where their duties lie. Parents will back you to their limits if they know what you are doing is born out of sincere regard for their children's welfare and when at times they may not be fully aware of the full implications of a course of action, they will go along with you because they know that action comes of the same genuine concern.
(c) I not only appeal to parents at this time, but this is a "soapbox" I mount at other meetings. "Make us popular with your children. We are human enough to want to be liked by you all, but whether your personally like us or not, try always to express yourself kindly towards us in front of your children. You want your children to work well at school, children do work well for people they like, you can help us - at all times make us out as likeable people."
[page 54]
The parents are at first amused by this request, but realise the truth behind it. Later I suspect - or hope, many are hoist by their own petard and indoctrinate themselves as well as the children. Anyway, the children benefit.
Increasingly, I am aware and here I am not being ego-centric, that parents tend to judge a school far more on the personality of the headteacher than on any other factor. If it is blame then the headteacher rightly should accept responsibility, but all too often the plaudits come exclusively to him, which seems a little unfair on his colleagues. Consequently, I believe that it is part of my job, on all occasions, to act, not so much as PRO [public relations officer], but as publicity agent for my staff with the parents. I believe it is correct that a parent should be told what a nice person a certain teacher is and how pleased you are with what they are doing, soon there is a mutual admiration society going on behind a teacher's back. This works both ways, in like manner a parent's good qualities should be held up in front of the staff.
Twice a year we issue a report to every parent based on a battery of five Schonell tests and every child is placed in a quartile. We are aware that the norms for these tests are probably not correct for the present day child, but they allow us to indicate to parents a degree of attainment and an indication of progress of their child in competition against its own age rather than its comparative attainments against other children. While I am not prepared at this point to argue the rights and wrongs of testing children of this age and whether the way we do it is as valid as it could be, we are convinced - and my staff me fully behind me on this - that parents need some indication of progress based a little more clinically than a general comment on their child's progress by a teacher and which allows teacher and parent to have a common knowledge of attainment on which they can more rightly base their discussion on the more cogent factor of a child's attitude.
The June test is always followed by two days when the school is open to parents to come into school to view the work of their children. The reports on their children have been issued previously so that these can be compared with the children's classwork and then, in discussion with the classteacher, a fairly full understanding can be reached by the parents of their child's progress and more important, the part they can play in furthering this.
These open days are also used to display certain school talents, our orchestra, choir, choral-speaking and movement. We also believe that the standard of these "party pieces" must be as high as possible, that it is not enough to allow child-based sentimentality to capture a parent's heart, but there must be real pride in the standard. Consequently our parents are our best press-agents, which is as it should be.
[page 55]
One thing that we do wins us a lot of co-operation. We mount a large display in the assembly hall, collected from all the classes, of all the work the children have done relevant to various educational journeys. We then, very openly, tell the parents, that when, from time to time we ask for them to provide various amounts of money in order that their children can go on this theatre trip or that educational journey, it is allowing their child an experience which will be the stimulus needed to involve their child in learning. The proof of this rather blatant propaganda is that when our school goes anywhere, without question, the whole school goes, parents co-operating all the way.
I have mentioned that we run a school orchestra. This orchestra plays for all morning assemblies plus all parent functions. It comprises some 20 violinists, 2 violas, 1 cellist, a few melodicas, brass, one antique keyboard glockenspiel and some 50 recorder players. Only the glockenspiel and cello belong to the school, all other instruments are bought by the individual parents. No child, no matter how poor its circumstances, is denied its right to be in the orchestra. One parent, very poor, paid in instalments over two years. These instalments were not regular, no-one ever asked for them, they all came eventually. The reason we ask parents to buy the instruments is obvious when you see the care the children lavish on their own instrument, plus the fact that the parents are more obviously concerned. What is more important is why all parents are willing to do this. We endeavour to make sure that each child invited to be in the orchestra will succeed with the instrument. So far, in four years, we have had no failures, no child who has given up playing through sheer frustration of not keeping up to its fellows. The child uses the instrument every day; in other words we make it very clear to the parents that we are not being half-hearted over the business. Possibly, the best way we make this clear and some indication of our relationship with the parents is the fact that the string-players' parents are asked to sign a paper stating that only the headteacher can give permission for a child to cease learning an instrument.
It is not enough for a school to expect parents merely to back intent, it must be cemented by ceremony and bonded by practice.
The ceremony however must not be a mere pandering to autocratic power, but an expression of faith from both sides. The signing of the paper is explained to them that there will come a time when the new toy has lost its glamour and the drudgery has shown its head. This is the time that small girls - and boys, but the girl image seems especially significant - will climb on to Daddy's knee and say, "Daddy, tell that horrible Mr. So-and-So, (depending on whom they fix the blame) that I don't have to play that nasty violin again." If two small tears accompany this request, Daddy is willing to come and tear down the school to rescue his princess from the dragon. I remind fathers that this paper he is
[page 56]
signing blunts his lance and that the dragon may well be sitting on his knee and that at this time the child needs patience, understanding and firmness to combat what is always a temporary phase.
Later, so many parents tell us this happened as we had predicted and how they have nursed the child over a difficult period. They are always so full of admiration for our predicting what seems so apparent.
This does however bring up the one point this school tries so hard to do and that is to keep all parents informed of what we are doing but more importantly, the reason why we do things. There still comes a time when the reason why is not sufficient for certain parents to do the right thing by their child and it is at these times that a school should be prepared to demand a standard of conduct towards every child that comes so easily from the good parent. E.g. Every January we take all the school to see a Christmas play - not pantomime. When the buses arrive back at school from the excursion, every child has an adult to meet it. Any child not so met is taken home by the staff, but next morning I am prepared to send the parents of such a child a strongly worded letter or pay a personal visit to ask what kind of parents allow a small child to risk walking a town's dark streets. The proof of our co-operation is that I have never had to do this, possibly because the parents know this would happen and a few, a very few, may curse us for it, but I feel sure never "blame" us for it.
This leads to a further point, there is not one of us on the staff who does not realise that we can, inadvertently, do something foolish, which can be offensive to a parent. Equally, there is not one of us who will not, upon realisation, apologise, quite humbly, to the offended parent. This has led to our parents not taking offence over foolish things we might have done or seem to have done. Consequently, while an anxious parent may come into school, we never appear to get angry parents.
Possibly an outline of occasions when parents were specifically invited into school over the last year may give some indication of the opportunities for contact:
June. All parents of third year children invited into school at 4 p.m. Tea and biscuits provided, when the staff address them on the work of the children in the fourth year. This is a year of great worry to parents. Grammar school gremlins are already upsetting parental dreams. We discuss the problem frankly, we do not specifically want to allay anxiety, which seems both natural and healthy, but we can at least put the situation into reasonable perspective.
[page 57]
June. A garden party, ostensibly to raise enough money to buy a 16mm sound projector for the school, but in actuality a proof of how our parents were willing to work for the school, how willing they were to give and what a happy community we are in each others company (we raised £170).
July. Two days, when parents can come into the classroom in which their children are working (this has been described).
Sept. A meeting with all the first year parents to discuss the school, what we aim to do with their children. To ask parents to give us any individual picture of their children, their health, their anxieties. We also aim to do away with some of the mystiques with which parents surround teachers and teaching and which all too often teachers tend to promulgate.
e.g. Question: "Can we help our children with their arithmetic or will we be interfering with your methods?"
Our answer: "Who is the better mountain climber, the one who only knows one way by which to tackle a certain mountain or the one who has climbed it from a variety of different angles? We will show the child the easy methods, but your methods, though probably more old-fashioned can be co-ordinated to give your child a better understanding of number bonds." We point out that help from parents breeds better attitudes to learning because of the interest they are showing to the child.
Parents so want to help. I believe it rather egotistical of our profession that we lose a lot of home-engendered ego-involvement of the child by refusing parents this right on the basis that only we can teach the correct way.
Dec. Three separate opportunities for parents to join us in our carol service. This year the service is based on the story of Caedman and is done as a full school project over the whole of the Christmas term. Also at these services we invite the rest of our school family to join us at the same time, the nursing service, kitchen staff, divisional office staff, caretaking staff, plus a host of people who have been in school during the year and helped. At a brief talk before we commence we acknowledge these people, we push very hard at the word "family".
These "formal" occasions are coupled with parents joining us for assembly throughout the year plus an ever-open school.
[page 58]
This above all, as a staff we are genuinely all good friends, this is the best basis for friendship in which the children can join in and through them the parents. There is no loss to authority, rather it gains because it is so little needed.
3. A city school
The school is situated in an area which was previously good class residential, but which has since the Second World War become a "problem area" in the city. The substantial properties were occupied mainly by Jewish people in the first instance, and later by central European nationalities. The community is now one with a large immigrant population. Many of the children come from broken homes and are living in the confined space of one or two rooms.
There are still parents who speak little English though quite a number of the children are bilingual. Such is the situation in the environment of the school which includes in its population children of some fifteen nationalities.
There is no parent teacher association, because it is felt that contact with all parents is a greater necessity. The parents are encouraged to come into the school quite freely to see the teachers and headteacher to discuss their children's progress and any difficulties that they might have. One West Indian father recently came to the school to ask for details of books (and prices) used in the teaching of reading. He had formed a small group of children in his own home, and was hearing them read to help their progress in school. Such was his anxiety that the West Indian children should do well.
The headteacher spends considerable time in advising about visits to doctor, dentist and hospital and in helping to fill-in forms of various kinds, but also in that which is more valuable, in listening to the domestic problems and gaining a knowledge of the children's background which is at times almost unbelievable.
On Thursday afternoon each week, the infant school has the use, by arrangement with the head teacher of the junior school, of an indoor swimming pool. The parents come along and help to rub down their own and other children, and also to enjoy watching the children's activities in the pool. They come along to Christmas festivities and help with the children's party. Some immigrant mothers are employed as dinner helpers.
All the washing of PE briefs is done by the mothers, and they do a considerable amount of sewing for the school. They also collect cartons and waste material for the activity periods.
[page 59]
At a recent non-competitive music festival held for infants in the various areas of the city, the children of the school sang a song which was brought to the notice of the headteacher by a West Indian mother and which everyone enjoyed.
There is as yet no nursery school in the area and a need was felt to provide some place where the children might have a space to play and opportunity for mixing with other children and of learning to speak a common language. A small group of parents, immigrant and English, met periodically in their own homes and raised a small sum of money with this thought in mind. They invited the headmistress of the infant school, two local clergymen, and one or two other people whom they thought might be interested, to a meeting in one of their homes and a steering committee was formed.
With the help of the housing committee, premises were secured at a low rental. Students from the university, parents and helpers, cleaned and decorated and eventually a pre-school play group was established. This however, was but a beginning and the play group has now become a children's centre. Play groups are being held in the morning and afternoon and there are after school club's for the infant and junior age groups. This is most valuable as a very large proportion of mothers are at work until 5 p.m. or later.
A needlework class, a handicraft group and a drama group are being held for the senior age groups. Girls from one of the city's high schools have made toys and apparatus for use at the centre. With the assistance of a member of the Sikh temple and a lecturer at the university, classes are being formed to help some of the parents to speak English. The work has so far been almost entirely voluntary. Much of the money has been raised by public appeal, and a film showing the play group at work has been used to rouse interest.
A great deal remains to be done but progress is interesting and, incidentally, provides greater opportunity for contact with parents outside school as well as within.
4. A school with a high proportion of Indian immigrants
Before it is possible to make suggestions about establishing a good working relationship between groups of people, it is necessary to make an appraisal of the situation and consider the aims and aspirations of the constituent groups as they existed before they came together. Then common ground can form a basis on which to build, and differences can be resolved and ideas emanating from both groups incorporated into the new joint structure. This is what has been attempted here.
[page 60]
In 1956-57 when the number of Indian families coming to live in the area, caused the primary and secondary modern boys schools in the district to have a noticeable number of Indian pupils, the situation was that the district had no council houses, the properties were owner occupied, and were terraced or semi-detached villas built before 1914 and without garages. In many cases, as a result of post-war housing shortage, they were occupied by an elderly couple and their married son or daughter with their young children. As these young families prospered they tended to move away into more modern houses. There was a high rate of employment, a rising standard of living and, consequently, by the parents, an interest in, and great expectations from, the educational opportunities of their children.
The primary and secondary schools had a deservedly high reputation. There was no lack of accommodation or amenities. They had been built about 40 years. About 25 per cent of primary pupils passed on to grammar schools and extended courses were successfully run in the modern schools, where the leaving age was sixteen rather than fifteen. But there was beginning to be a drop in numbers, noticeable in the infant schools as the prosperous families left the district and the families coming in were poorer and the properties were considered less desirable than more modern ones in adjoining areas. Thus there were at that time both housing and school places available for the Indian immigrants.
Although there was no formal parent/teacher association, there was close co-operation between parents and teachers. Many parents had attended the schools themselves and the staff had been so stable that some had taught both parent and child. Valuable intimate knowledge of a child's personal background was thereby available to all the staff. Functions were held each term to which 80 to 90 per cent of the parents came. Written progress reports were sent home. Routine health inspections brought parents to the school and gave opportunities for meeting the headteacher, contacting class teachers and making an enquiry without the feeling of going to the school only when a complaint had to be made. Local councillors lived in the area and their children attended the school. Thereby a close link was made with the local education authority and members could speak from personal experience when projects involving the school were being discussed.
The Indian adults ranged from graduates through craftsmen and retail traders to peasants illiterate in their own language as they had never been to any school. But they all ardently desired schooling for their children, for its financial benefit and for social prestige. The children were sent to school regularly and reasonably dressed and clean according to their parents standards. They were
[page 61]
conscious of differences amongst themselves. Some thought they could obtain privileged treatment by offering payment. Those who had some education expected a very formal curriculum, and offered to teach the children "the book" if we would tell which book was used. But in general they did not expect to be involved in the school life or feel any obligation to participate even by attending medical inspections. Curiosity brought them to school functions rather than a feeling of duty towards their children or a desire to contribute to or share in the child's school life. They had a great respect for teachers, but did not expect to discuss their children openly, even with a Punjabi speaking teacher.
We were fortunate in having a good relationship already in the school between teachers, pupils and parents and most parents, both English and Indian, were concerned about their children's education. The staff were genuinely interested in the welfare of all their pupils and prepared to try to cater for the individual needs of each child, whether he was a "problem child" or a bewildered non-English speaking Indian, a bookworm, an artist or an athletic type. We looked for and found all the possible varieties among English and immigrant pupils and soon treated them as personalities regardless of racial origin.
We made the school a lively interesting environment to which the children wanted to come and then tackled any parent, English or Indian, who did not co-operate over regular attendance, suitable clothing or cleanliness. Whenever the opportunity arose for informal contact with parents, when calling for a child for a clinic appointment, met in the street, as spectators in football or netball matches, they were made to feel welcome, even if communication had to be made by gestures or translation through a child.
The greatest difficulty which had to be overcome was the fear of the unknown and mutual distrust. Both communities had inaccurate information about each other and were looking for pre-conceived troubles that they expected to arise. Also they each feared that the other would prejudice the educational opportunity of their children. We tried to alleviate these fears by not altering our school work except in minor ways to make it possible for Indians to participate fully. The following are some examples of our fears and prejudices and how we dealt with them.
The English parents complained that the lack of spoken English meant their children were held back while the teacher taught the Indians. We had special reception classes and only when they could join in were the Indians put in with English children.
The English thought the Indians were dirty, verminous and diseased. We had special medical and cleanliness inspections and dealt with any cases very
[page 62]
promptly and published the Medical Officer's reports to show how exaggerated the rumours were.
We continued successfully to participate in school journeys, in school sports and music activities, including Indians in our teams as they became sufficiently proficient.
Although the Indians had to get someone to translate for them we continued to send home a letter at the beginning of each term telling the parents the dates of holidays, special occasions and activities such as swimming so that they knew what was going on in the school, and a written report about child's progress at the end of the year which was signed and returned to the school. In this way, amenities already accepted by the English community were retained.
The Indians were afraid that the reception classes meant discrimination, until they saw how their children progressed and were transferred and, in time, some were given places in the grammar schools. In order not to offend sincere religious beliefs, no Sikh was asked to cut his hair, for example, but the unsuitability of national dress for little girls was obvious when parents visited the school and saw the children on the gymnastic apparatus.
Whenever we realised that a difficult situation was developing a parents' meeting was called and the matter discussed openly. Sometimes we had a meeting for English parents only, for example to deal with a rumour that the school was to become wholly Indian: sometimes for Indian parents only to explain the English school system and acquaint them with the educational opportunities available: sometimes, for example, discussion of secondary reorganisation, a joint meeting. In the latter two cases a talk was translated into Punjabi by an interpreter.
In the neighbourhood of the school the children took part in such social work as taking harvest festival gifts to old people, singing at socials for the disabled and they were encouraged to join organisations such as Brownies, Cubs and the Life Brigade, therefore meeting and knowing one another's relatives. By such contacts, the spirit engendered in the school flowed out and was felt in the neighbourhood.
If a good relationship between the school and the home is to be established, there must be knowledge about the local situation and people involved so that no unreasonable demands are made. Then there must be mutual respect and confidence between teachers, children and parents and all must feel that they
[page 63]
are working together for the good of one another and receiving their fair share of attention.
Matters, usually complaints, must be discussed openly and with patience and courtesy so that tolerant understanding is established.
Opportunities must be found for enjoyment in which all share; concerts in which all take part, for example, open evenings to which children accompany their parents. An interest must be taken in the neighbourhood so that the school takes a real place in the life of the community.
To achieve this pleasant relationship, great demands are made on the teaching staff, and all connected with the school. But it is well worth it to achieve an atmosphere without tension or ill-feeling and the value of this is obvious even in the children's purely academic progress while at school, and it must surely affect their attitude to their fellows throughout their lives. As a parent wrote "We can only be thankful that they have an opportunity to mix with, and maybe learn a little about people of different races, languages and creeds while they are young. We hope this will enable them to grow up into well adjusted adults without any of the bigoted opinions which to our dismay seem to be on the increase."
[page 65]
Also in this series:
Education Survey No. 1 - Units for Partially-hearing Children Education
Survey No. 2 - Drama
Education Survey No. 3 - Language Laboratories
Education Survey No. 4 - Blind and Partially-sighted Children
[inside back cover]
© Crown copyright 1968
Published by
Her Majesty's Stationery Office
To be purchased from
49 High Holborn, London WC1
13A Castle Street. Edinburgh 2
109 St. Mary Street, Cardiff CF1 1JW
Brazennose Street, Manchester M60 8AS
50 Fairfax Street. Bristol BS1 3DE
258 Broad Street, Birmingham 1
7 Linenhall Street, Belfast BT2 8AY
or through any bookseller
SBN 11 270030 6